RPI Logo

Protein Fouling of Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration Membranes

Paul Hegener



Introduction

Membrane filtration is currently one of the most widely used separation techniques employed by the biotechnology industry as a means of recovering desired products from cellular lysate and fermentation medium. As these biologically-derived products become more important as pharmaceutical products, it in turn becomes increasingly important to understand how to optimize membrane filtration processes. One of the most important aspects of optimizing membrane filtration of protein-containing solutions is understanding the extraordinary fouling effect that proteins have upon membranes. Optimizing the filtration of protein solutions requires specific techniques different from those used during the filtration of non-protein solutions.

Membrane Construction and Characteristics

Synthetic membranes used for the recovery of biological products are usually composed of polymeric materials such as: polyethersulfone, nylon, cellulose acetate, and polyvinylidene fluoride. The properties and structure of the various membranes are dependent upon their specific material of construction.

Microfiltration vs. Ultrafiltration

Two classes of membrane filtration systems are commonly used to filter protein solutions. These two classes are: microfiltration and ultrafiltration. Microfiltration and ultrafiltration systems are mostly similar, with the one major difference between the two being the average pore size of the membranes. Microfiltration membranes have an average pore size of approximately one micrometer. The proteins, water, and other smaller solutes pass through the membrane, while the larger cellular components are retained by the membrane. Ultrafiltration membranes have an average pore size ranging approximately from 1 to 250 nanometers. The proteins and larger solutes are retained by the membrane while water and smaller solutes passes through the membrane. Often, these processes are performed in series, microfiltration followed by ultrafiltration, to recover and concentrate the protein.

Modes of Membrane Fouling

There are three different modes by which membranes foul. These modes include: pore narrowing/constriction, pore plugging, and gel/cake layer formation.

Cross-flow Filtration: An Overview

For large-scale, industrial membrane filtration, cross-flow or tangential- flow filtration is commonly employed.

Protein Structure Within Solution

The first step in attempting to understand the mechanism by which proteins foul membranes which is different than that for other types of particles is to understand the structure of the protein molecule .

Protein Aggregation

Proteins in solution have the ability to interact with one another. When proteins interact, they tend to mass together to form large particles called protein aggregates. Protein aggregation is similar to coagulation of colloidal particles in solution. It is this aggregation of proteins, the formation of particles much larger than individual protein molecules which is one of the reasons protein solutions tend to foul filtration membranes to an extent greater than non- protein containing solutions. There appear to be two mechanisms by which proteins aggregate: main hydrophobic interactions and thiol oxidation / thiol-disulfide interchange reactions.

Peculiarities of Protein Filtration

During the filtration on non-protein solutions (suspensions), the values of the system parameters can be adjusted to enhance the flux as the membrane becomes fouled. Often, during the filtration of suspensions, a cake layer is formed at the surface of the membrane which is non-compressible. Increasing the transmembrane pressure will increase the flux across the membrane for these systems. However, proteins tend to form compressible cakes at the surface of the membrane. As the transmembrane pressure is increased, the particle cake formed at the surface of the membrane compresses, thereby decreasing the flux across the membrane and increasing the sieving of the proteins.
During the filtration of suspensions, the shear across the surface of the membrane is often increased to remove the cake built up at the surface of the membrane. This is done either by increasing the velocity of the feed across the surface of the membrane, or by using system geometries which generate vortices which essentially "scour" the particles from the surface of the membrane. While this may work for suspensions, it appears to have the opposite effect upon protein solutions. Increasing the shear across the membrane surface during the filtration of protein solutions tends to increase the rate of aggregation of the proteins in the solution.
Therefore, since conventional methods to optimize flux do not work well during protein filtration, other methods to optimize flux during protein filtration must be developed.

Methods Used to Control Fouling of Membranes During Filtration of Protein Solutions

Backflushing/Backpulsing
Membrane Surface Modification